Congressional Committee Votes Tomorrow on repealing DC Law Legalizing Assisted Suicide

National   Jennifer Popik, J.D.   Jul 12, 2017   |   6:19PM    Washington, DC

On Thursday, July 13, Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) is expected to offer an amendment at the full committee mark-up of the Commerce, Justice and Science and Financial Services appropriations bill. The amendment would repeal the District of Columbia’s dangerous assisted suicide law. If approved, the amendment would become part of the larger appropriations package.

National Right to Life sent a letter of support today to Members of Congress.

Since its inception, the pro-life movement has been as concerned with protecting the lives of older people and people with disabilities as it has been dedicated to protecting unborn children from abortion. Therefore, NRLC has always vigorously opposed legalizing assisted suicide and strongly supports the amendment from Rep. Harris.

Five states (California, Colorado, Oregon, Washington, and Vermont) and D.C. permit the dangerous practice of allowing physicians to write lethal prescriptions to certain groups of persons living with serious illness.

Where legal, as is the case with the D.C. law, assisted suicide laws permit insurance companies to pay for the lethal doses. Moreover, nothing in the law prevents insurance companies from promoting the relatively inexpensive drugs.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Apart from the danger of permitting insurers to recommend suicide drugs to seriously ill patients, the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-12 (Apr. 30, 1997), which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, strictly forbids the District from using funds for purposes related to assisted suicide.

While the D.C. law was promoted as “merely” providing another end of life “option,” this law can become a vehicle to push the medically vulnerable into an early death.

The legal definition of terminal illness used in D.C. will sweep in vast groups of people who could otherwise live for many years with continued treatment. Additionally, there is no requirement that patients be screened for depression or other treatable mental illness.

National Right to Life strongly supports this amendment.

LifeNews Note: Jennifer Popik is a medical ethics attorney with National Right to Life.