The Montana Supreme Court has issued a ruling allowing nurses to do abortions even as abortions are injuring women across the country.
Prohibiting Montana nurses and midwives from aborting unborn babies is unconstitutional, the state’s highest court ruled. It issued a ruling in favor of Montana nurse practitioner Helen Weems and an unnamed nurse midwife who challenged a state law prohibiting them from doing abortions.
The state high court unanimously declared that the law limiting abortions to doctors and physician assistants is unconstitutional based on a 1999 Montana Supreme Court ruling in Armstrong that improperly found a so-called “right” to abort unborn babies in the state constitution based on the right to privacy. Nothing at the time of the adoption of the privacy clause had adopted wanting it used to promote killing babies in abortions.
Emilee Cantrell, spokeswoman for Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen, slammed the ruling, saying abortionists’ financial interests are being prioritized above women’s safety.
“The state Supreme Court has become disgracefully radicalized and out of touch with Montanans,” she said. “This case was not about the right to abortion – it was about whether women have a right to an elevated standard of care during an abortion. The Montana Supreme Court said ‘no’ and lowered the standard of care set by the Legislature, effectively constitutionalizing the right of unqualified individuals to perform unregulated abortions. This decision is a loss for Montana women who will be less safe because of the state Supreme Court.”
Knudsen also recently asked the state Supreme Court to overturn its 1999 pro-abortion ruling. The Planned Parenthood abortion chain is using the ruling to challenge three other state pro-life laws.
“All three laws unquestionably enhance the health and safety of Montana women,” Knudsen’s office argued in the case. “And they represent basic regulations of the practice of medicine—bread-and-butter exercises of [state government].But Planned Parenthood’s business is abortion, and these laws require modest changes to its business practices. So Plaintiffs asked the courts to do what they couldn’t through the legislative process—save them the trouble of providing better care to Montana women.”
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Meanwhile, pro-abortion groups rejoiced at the news that medical workers with less training now may abort unborn babies in Montana.
Most states require that abortions be done by licensed medical doctors. A 2013 study from the University of California San Francisco found that abortions done by non-physicians were twice as likely to have complications as those done by licensed physicians.
The ruling Friday means nurse practitioners and nurse midwives may abort unborn babies in the first trimester either with abortion drugs or through the aspiration method, according to the AP.
An aspiration abortion involves a suction catheter being “inserted into the mother’s uterus to extract the preborn baby. Tools are then used to scrape the lining of the uterus to remove any remaining parts,” according to former abortionist Dr. Anthony Levatino.
The growing push to allow nurses to do abortions is one of the ways the abortion industry hopes to prop up its life-destroying business. Abortion rates are dropping and abortion clinics have been closing partly because fewer doctors are willing to abort unborn babies. According to the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute, in 1982, there were 2,918 abortion doctors practicing in America, but by 2011, there were only 1,720. A number of abortion clinics also have closed in the past few years because abortionists retired and no one was willing to take their places, according to a 2016 Bloomberg report.
