Leaked communications from internal Facebook message boards show the tech company’s employees pushed to kick right-wing news sites off Facebook’s News Tab, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.
Facebook employees wanted to suppress right-wing news organizations and kick conservative site Breitbart off of the platform’s News Tab, a Facebook feature which gathers and shares news stories, The Wall Street Journal reported. While the leaked documents don’t capture all internal employee communications, they make no reference to similar efforts by employees to suppress left-wing sites, according to the WSJ.
One Facebook employee in 2018 suggested that Facebook’s relationship with Breitbart was a tacit endorsement of the news site’s views and practices, and the employee argued that the site should be dropped from Facebook’s advertising network, the WSJ reported.
“My argument is that allowing Breitbart to monetize through us is, in fact, a political statement,” the employee wrote, according to the WSJ. “It’s an acceptance of extreme, hateful and often false news used to propagate fear, racism and bigotry.”
Follow LifeNews on the MeWe social media network for the latest pro-life news free from Facebook’s censorship!
Another Facebook employee reportedly pointed to three articles by Breitbart covering riots in the wake of the killing of George Floyd as “emblematic of a concerted effort at Breitbart and similarly hyperpartisan sources (none of which belong in News Tab) to paint Black Americans and Black-led movements in a very negative way.”
The articles, titled “Minneapolis Mayhem: Riots in Masks,” “Massive Looting, Buildings in Flames, Bonfires!” and “BLM Protesters Pummel Police Cars on 101,” were referenced in a message posted to the company’s racial-justice chat board in an effort to urge Facebook to remove Breitbart from the News Tab, according to the WSJ.
When reached for comment, Facebook denied that politics played a role in its decisions regarding
“We make changes to reduce problematic or low-quality content to improve people’s experiences on the platform, not because of a Page’s political point of view,” a Facebook spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “When it comes to changes that will impact public Pages like publishers, of course we analyze the effect of the proposed change before we make it.”
Facebook executives and managers regularly override lower-level employees’ requests to censor right-wing content, according to the WSJ. Internal research from Facebook also showed that tools Facebook put in place following the 2016 election to limit the spread of “misinformation” disproportionately affected right-wing news sites.
The leaked documents also reportedly showed that Facebook chose not to enforce its content moderation rules on high-profile conservative accounts, including that of former President Donald Trump.
LifeNews Note: Ailan Evans writes for Daily Caller. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.