Democrat Congressman May Become a Republican Because Democrats are Trying to Impeach President Trump

National   |   Nicholas Fondacaro   |   Dec 16, 2019   |   2:18PM   |   Washington, DC

The Democratic Party and media crusade to impeach President Trump didn’t appear to be going well Sunday, as New Jersey Democratic Congressman Jeff Van Drew was set to vote against the Articles of Impeachment and become a Republican in the process. ABC’s Good Morning America and NBC’s Sunday Today spent some of their mornings trying to convince the public it was no big deal. Yet, part of the intent of the hearings was to peel Republicans away from Trump, which would’ve been celebrated.

“This representative, Jeff Van Drew from New Jersey is a freshman Democrat. He’s not only going to vote against impeachment, but he’s actually going to quit the Democratic Party and join the Republicans,” prefaced ABC co-anchor Dan Harris to chief anchor George Stephanopoulos. “Is this consequential in your mind?”

After admitting it was “good news” for President Trump, Stephanopoulos attempted to discount Van Drew defection as just political maneuvering:

STEPHANOPOULOS: You have to look at the specific facts of Jeff Van Drew’s district. He does come — he’s a Democrat, but he does come from a Trump district inside New Jersey. And it became pretty clear once he announced he was against the impeachment inquiry back in the fall that he was going to face a Democratic challenger in the primary. And the polls showed that a majority of Democrats actually were against re-electing Jeff Van Drew.

“So in some way, if he wanted to hold onto his seat, he had no choice. The question will be, will Trump’s support make the difference in his re-election, because he’s going to face a tough Republican primary as well,” he added.

Over on NBC’s Sunday Today, White House correspondent Kelly O’Donnell dismissed Van Drew’s party defection as “not enough to alter the outcome,” then lamented, “but a single party switch feeds the Trump argument that impeachment is partisan.” In reality, it wasn’t just an “argument,” it was fact, and opposition to impeachment was bipartisan.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from

“The President courted Congressman Van Drew, had him to the White House. What’s the significance of some of these defections, because the House likely still will go do Democrats’ way,” wondered host Willie Geist to White House correspondent Kristen Welker.

After noting that New York Congressman Anthony Brindisi (D) was also thinking about opposing impeachment, she appeared to whine about how, “even if they can peel off a few Democrats, Willie, the President is going crow about that on the campaign trail. He’s going to say that’s a victory for him.”

“And by the way, they are expecting Republicans to vote in lockstep with him. So, obviously, he’s going to tout that as well,” she added.

In response, Geist seemed to suggest Trump should feel “very confident” because the Senate was rigged in his favor:

GEIST: And he’s got to be feeling very confident, the White House has to feel very confident when you hear Mitch McConnell sat, “there is no way the President will be removing from office.” When you hear Lindsey Graham saying, “I am not going to pretend I’m an impartial juror here. I’m never going to vote to convict the President.”

Again, if Democrats managed to peel Republicans away from Trump, the media would celebrate it as a victory for democracy or the rule of law. And if Van Drew’s defection wasn’t a big deal, then why were they trying to convince people it wasn’t?

LifeNews Note: Nicholas Fondacaro writes for Newsbusters, where this originally appeared.