Abortion Activist Rachel Maddow Only Cares About Babies If They’re Children of Illegal Immigrants

Opinion   |   Jack Coleman   |   May 10, 2018   |   12:23PM   |   Washington, DC

Arguably it is the single most laughable thing that liberals do — piously ooze purported concern for babies while otherwise elevating abortion on demand to a sacred right that must be defended at all costs.

No leftist in media better evokes this perverted dynamic than MSNBC’s clownish master of smarm, Rachel Maddow.

Her most recent example might well have set a record for cringes among conservatives who comprise a sliver of her audience. On her show Monday night, Maddow was talking about First Lady Melania Trump’s signature effort, “Be Best,” which is “an awareness campaign dedicated to the most valuable and fragile among us, our children,” as Mrs. Trump described it.

Maddow then cited another Trump administration policy announcement that came shortly after (click “expand” to read more):

Sounds awful — until you consider that we’ve “ripped” babies from their mothers’ wombs, 60 million-plus and counting since Roe v. Wade in 1973. And how about that, Maddow is a huge fan of legalized abortion, can’t get enough. So while she’s emphatically not OK with the babies of illegals ripped from their mother’s arms, she’s way OK with babies ripped from their mothers’ wombs, preferably at taxpayer expense.

Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and the latest pro-life news.

Oddly, Maddow appears most concerned with the youngest of illegals, the babies and cuddly tots as opposed to older kids and those ungainly teens. It’s almost like she’s suggesting we should be more protective of children the younger they are — which might come across as credible if not from a fawning supporter of industrial-scale infanticide.

Notice too her conspicuous absence of any suggestion of illegality on the part of people trying to enter the US … illegally. Instead, Maddow airily asserts that illegals are trying to cross the border “without papers,” as if it’s little more than a clerical error or oversight. (Honey, did you check the glove compartment …?).

Does any rational person expect that if an American tried to enter another country illegally , with his or her child as a human shield, that that country is obligated to a, let them to enter and stay, and b, keep them together? And if you answered yes to both, congrats, you’re a moonbat and also unfit for parenthood.

The policy announced by Sessions is an obvious attempt to deter illegals from making the trip, which is the actual reason Maddow hates it. As a prototypical lib, she wants as many people as possible dependent on government, because that’s the only thing keeping Democrats in government. And there is no more surefire strategy for dependency than unchecked immigration.

LifeNews Note: Katie Yoder writes for Newsbusters, where this originally appeared. The authors’ views do not necessarily represent those of LifeNews.