Nurses Upset at Seeing Aborted Baby Move, Abortion Doc Called Baby a “Spinal Animal”

National   |   Sarah Terzo   |   Aug 16, 2016   |   12:04PM   |   Washington, DC

Nurses upset after seeing aborted baby move

When nurses at a New York hospital got upset at the sight of an aborted baby that moved, the physician said that it was nothing more than “a reflexive response of a spinal animal.”

Howard D. Kibel “Staff Reactions to Abortion: A Psychiatrist’s View” Obstetrics and Gynecology 39 (January 1972): 131

Quoted in William Brennan The Abortion Holocaust: Today’s Final Solution (St. Louis, Missouri, 1983)

Abortionist feels he is “destroying life”

From one abortionist:

“I never had any psychological adverse reaction except the occasional feeling that one was destroying life.”

Magda Denes In Necessity and Sorrow: Life and Death in an Abortion Hospital (New York: Basic Books, 1976) 141

Medical journal: dismembering fetus is “distressing”

From the Journal of Medical Ethics:

“It is clear that physically dismembering and removing the fetus is emotionally distressing for the doctor. A doctor, therefore, has to overcome an element of revulsion in order to do a late term surgical termination of pregnancy… Dismemberment of a baby so violates a general human instinct that it is morally worse than destruction of the fetus by other means.”

Nicholas Johnson, Journal of Medical Ethics 1989, vol. 15, p 82

Follow on Instagram for pro-life pictures and the latest pro-life news. Note: Sarah Terzo is a pro-life liberal who runs, a web site devoted to exposing the abortion industry. She is a member of the pro-life groups Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians and Secular Pro-Life. Follow her on Twitter and Facebook. File photo below.