Planned Parenthood Should Lose Funding Over Exploting Teen for Abortion

State   Steven Ertelt   Dec 10, 2010   |   5:25PM    Cincinnati, OH

Leading pro-life groups are reacting to the news that an Ohio judge ruled for the parents of a sexually abused teenager, on whom Planned Parenthood in Cincinnati did an abortion.

The young girl, who was fourteen at the time of the abortion, became pregnant by her 22 year-old soccer coach. Still pending in the case is a decision about Planned Parenthood’s potential violation of state parental notification laws, as well as a judgment as to the amount of damages Planned Parenthood must pay.

The abortion business did not have a proper informed consent meeting with the teenager, did not follow the state’s parental notification law and alert her parents to the abortion, and did not report the statutory rape to authorities as required under state law.

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said the decision by Judge Jody Luebbers, in which she said the teen was caused  significant psychological and emotional harm by Planned Parenthood, should result in the abortion business losing federal funding.

“Judge Jody Luebbers stood up to the nation’s largest abortion provider, ruling that Planned Parenthood defied state laws by not reporting suspected child abuse and not providing a mandatory counseling session – including offering pregnancy options – 24-hours prior to the abortion.  Despite these kinds of abuses, Planned Parenthood is a billion-dollar-a-year organization, raking in approximately $350 million annually in state and federal grants. 

“Once again, we see how Planned Parenthood has failed to protect the health and safety of women. And as we can see from this case, procuring an abortion is more important to Planned Parenthood than following the law on something as important as protecting young women from sexual predators.

“Isn’t it time to stop taxpayer funding of such a group?  We call on the new Congress to act quickly on legislation introduced by Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, a bill that would prohibit Title X family planning dollars being awarded to groups that provide abortion as family planning, such as Planned Parenthood.”

The Life Legal Defense Foundation, a pro-life legal group involved in the case, also commented on the decision:

Planned Parenthood lawyers claimed that Ohio’s informed consent laws did not apply to them based on an injunction issued in a previous challenge to the law, Cincinnati Womens’ Services v. Taft. The court in Taft issued an Agreed Order staying the enforcement of the statute which affected only the named defendants in the case and persons acting in concert with them.

However, on Tuesday the Judge ruled that the Agreed Order bound only the parties to the Taft case, and did not relieve PP of its duty to comply with the law since they were not a defendant in Taft. Evidence submitted to the Court indicated that PP was notified in writing by their attorney, also the attorney of record in Taft, that the A greed Order did not enjoin actions by anyone other than the named defendants in Taft.

Brian Hurley, attorney for Jane Roe, told Life Legal, “One of Planned Parenthood’s mantras is that it is very concerned about the health and safety of young girls and it does everything it can to ensure that young girls thinking about having an abortion are provided with the information and support necessary to make a voluntary and informed decision.

Judge Luebbers’ decisions expose the falsity of that mantra, both for Jane Roe and all of the other girls and women who between 1998 and 2005 Planned Parenthood deprived of their right to meet before the abortion with a medical doctor to be certain that the girls’ and womens’ decisions were informed and not coerced.”

Also, under Ohio law, any health-care professional who suspects child abuse, such as a 13-year-old engaging in sex with an adult, must report it. PP did not report in the case of Roe, who at the time of her abortion was 14 years old and the victim of sexual assault by her 22-year-old soccer coach, John Haller. Roe had the abortion in March 2004, and the abuse continued for some time after the abortion. Haller, who began having sex with the girl when she was 13, was ultimately convicted of sexual battery and served three years in prison.

The judge’s ruling leaves just one issue to be resolved at the February trial: whether PP is also liable for failure to contact Roe’s parents before the abortion, as required by Ohio’s parental involvement laws. At the time of the abortion, Roe gave Planned Parenthood workers a cell phone number she said was for her parents. Instead, the number belonged to Haller. Apparently PP made no attempt to confirm that they were speaking with Roe’s parent—an effort which might have saved Roe from much of the abuse that followed. The extent of PP’s liability for this failure remains to be determined. The case is set for trial Feb. 7. “We believe it will be a significant number.”