Pittsburgh Pro-Life Advocates Win Injunction Against Law Limiting Free Speech
by Steven Ertelt
October 13, 2010
Pittsburgh, PA (LifeNews.com) — Pro-life advocates in Pittsburgh won a legal battle today as a judge agreed to put an injunction in place against a law which restricts the right of pro-life people and others to distribute literature within the city.
The ACLJ filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of two pro-life advocates challenging the constitutionality of the Pittsburgh ordinance.
Today, U.S. District Court Judge David Cercone granted a temporarily injunction to stop the enforcement of the law that bans putting fliers on parked cars in the city. The law bans any written literature "so as to cause litter or unreasonably interfere with pedestrians or traffic" without permission of the owner of the car.
Two pro-life advocates, Kathleen Ramsey and Albert Brunn, challenged the constitutionality of the law so they could place voter guides on vehicles.
According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette newspaper, Edward White of the ACLJ, a pro-life law firm, argued the law was vague and stifled free speech. He said litter isn’t caused by people passing out pro-life information but by the drivers who toss the information to the streets instead of throwing it away.
Assistant city solicitor Michael Kennedy told the court the law was written to stop excessive litter problems caused by the distribution of literature, sales brochures and other items placed on vehicles and that it wasn’t intended to target political free speech.
The suspension of the laws means the two pro-life advocates, and others, will be able to get information to people within city limits without fear of prosecution.
Before the ruling, the ACLJ said, "At issue is the right of pro-life advocates to educate the public on pro-life matters, especially as they relate to the upcoming November 2nd elections. The plaintiffs seek to distribute literature to individuals and to place it on unoccupied parked carswithout fear of fine, penalty or censure."
"In our lawsuit, we contend the city’s ordinance is overbroad, vague and impinges on the rights of free speech and due process that the United States Constitution guarantees," it said.
The legal papers ACLJ filed added, The Supreme Court stated many years ago, [i]t has long been recognized that the First Amendment needs breathing space and that statutes attempting to restrict or burden the exercise of First Amendment rights must be narrowly drawn and represent a considered legislative judgment that a particular mode of expression has to give way to other compelling needs of society.
The ruling in this case follows another where the city lost a case regarding the buffer zone law that has been the subject of lawsuits by pro-life advocates. The debate revolves around a 2005 bubble zone law that restricted access to public areas surrounding abortion businesses.
U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer, this summer, granted a request from pro-life advocate Mary Kathryn Brown and ordered the city to pay $209,276 in attorney fees and costs, mostly to attorneys from The Alliance Defense Fund, a pro-life legal group that represented Brown.
Fisher reduced the amount requested from Brown’s attorneys by $48,272, the Tribune Review reported. Meanwhile, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is considering a similar fee request for $128,985.
City Solicitor Dan Regan told the newspaper the fees are excessive and the city challenged the amount.
The measure prohibits pro-life advocates from coming within 15 feet of the door of any health care facility, which would include abortion centers. Within 100 feet of the entrance, pro-life advocates must stay a distance of eight feet away from anyone heading to the abortion facility.
Alliance Defense Fund attorneys challenged the local law as unconstitutional for prohibiting speech and helped represent a pro-life nurse who took on the ordinance, which prohibited her from counseling and speaking with women.
In December, Fischer permanently prohibited the city using the so-called 100-foot bubble zone. That came after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit issued a key decision striking down the ordinance.
Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com
News Report Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here. Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.