Illinois Pro-Life Appearing in Court to Defend Parental Notification on Abortion

State   |   Steven Ertelt   |   Mar 12, 2010   |   9:00AM   |   WASHINGTON, DC

Illinois Pro-Lifers Appearing in Court to Defend Parental Notification on Abortion

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
March 12
, 2010

Springfield, IL (LifeNews.com) — A pro-life legal group will appear in court on Monday to defend the Illinois parental notification law, that has never been enforced, from attack by the ACLU. Attorneys from the Thomas More Society will appear in Cook County court again seeking to intervene in the latest pro-abortion lawsuit.

In Hope Clinic, et al., v. Brent Adams et al., Thomas More Society attorneys are representing Illinois State’s Attorneys Stu Umholtz, Ed Deters, and Ray Cavanaugh.

They maintain that because there is no right to abortion in the Illinois Constitution, the ACLU’s latest challenge to parental notice is baseless.

The Attorney General, representing various Illinois officials who are named as defendants, has moved to dismiss the case on other grounds.

"Because the ACLU has already lost in federal court, its lawyers must prove in state court that the Illinois Constitution of 1970 guaranteed a right to abortion that was even stronger than the federal abortion right upheld in Roe v. Wade, handed down in 1973," Thomas Brejcha, the Thomas More Society president, explained.

"This is an utter falsehood plainly belied by the historical record. Yet, instead of defending the Illinois Constitution, whose Framers clearly left the issue of abortion to the legislature, the Attorney General has tossed the Constitution aside and conceded to the ACLU on this key issue," he added.

He told LifeNews.com, "Illinois parents have a right to know before their kids are taken for abortions. If the Attorney General won’t defend the parental notice law vigorously, we will do so, until the day when there are no more secret abortions performed on Illinois children."

The law is meant to allow parents to know 48 hours in advance when their minor daughter is considering an abortion so they can help her find positive alternatives.

In November, Judge Dan Riley blocked enforcement of the parental notification law on abortion just hours after a state board approved letting it go into effect.
Judge Riley has granted Thomas More Society attorneys a special setting for their motion to intervene on Monday. Later, the court will hear the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss the ACLU’s case.

Parents in Illinois have waited for 15 years for a law to go into effect and a vote from the Illinois’ Medical Disciplinary Board made it appear that would happen.

The Illinois legislature approved the law in the 1990s, but it has been held up in court waiting for the Illinois Supreme Court to issue the rules guiding the law’s implementation.

After the court did its job, state officials blocked enforcement of the law with a 90-day grace period for abortion centers to became aware of it — even though similar laws have been on the books in other states for decades.

The board met in Chicago and decided not to extend the grace period further that the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation put in place.

However, Riley ruled in favor of the ACLU , which convinced him to issue an injunction with its claims that it violates the state constitution — even though abortion was not legal when the constitution was put in place.

If it ever goes into effect, Illinois will join 35 other states with similar laws with a statute that requires that abortion practitioners inform the parents of a teenager seeking an abortion.

The lawsuit, on behalf of Illinois abortion centers, says "most young women who seek abortions already involve their parents," which makes pro-life advocates in the state wonder why the ACLU would sue to overturn the parental involvement law.

The lawsuit cites emergency situations and gives examples of "teens whose
parents beat them, threw them out of the house, and/or forced them to become a parent against their will when they found out about the pregnancy."

However, the law already provides for a judicial bypass procedure whereby teenagers who face domestic violence concerns don’t have to involve their parents in the abortion decision.

The ACLU should know because it is already exploiting that aspect of the law.

Anna Clark at RH Reality Check, a pro-abortion blog, wrote recently that she is excited about how the Illinois ACLU is exploiting that loophole in the law to get abortions for any teenager who doesn’t want to tell their parents.

Leah Bartelt, the pro-abortion staff counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union in Illinois, is among those who have teamed together to form The Illinois Judicial Bypass Coordination Project as a response to the state’s new parental involvement law.

Clark admits the ACLU will exploit the abuse provision.

"It is designed to not only protect the right of the judicial bypass, but to make it accessible to young women who might otherwise be daunted by dodging through the legal process on their own," she said.

In its legal papers, the Illinois ACLU claims "Illinois courts are not prepared to handle these cases," which makes it appear it will push so many teenagers into secret abortions that the court system will be overwhelmed.

A Texas version of the hotline found 469 minors from around the country called to get secret abortions with its help.

The Illinois Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995 had been enjoined and
dormant since its passage by the Illinois General Assembly. This summer, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dissolved the permanent injunction.

The filing by the ACLU in state court challenges the law on state constitutional grounds and asks for an injunction to prevent the law from helping teens and their parents while the lawsuit moves forward in court.

The Hope Clinic for Women abortion center and Dr. Allison Cowett, the Director of the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Center for Reproductive Health are the plaintiffs named in the ACLU lawsuit. No teenagers or their parents are parties in the suit claiming to represent their interests.

Related web sites:
Thomas More Society – https://www.thomasmoresociety.org

Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com

Daily Pro-Life News Report Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here. Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.