Bioethicist Wesley Smith: Senate Health Care Bill is Assisted Suicide Friendly

Bioethics   |   Steven Ertelt   |   Nov 19, 2009   |   9:00AM   |   WASHINGTON, DC

Bioethicist Wesley Smith: Senate Health Care Bill is Assisted Suicide Friendly

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 19
, 2009

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — Bioethicist Wesley J. Smith says the new Senate health care reform bill contains another problem apart form abortion funding. The new measure is friendly to assisted suicide in that it contains language supporting physicians who don’t want to kill their patients but promotes the practice nonetheless.

Smith, an attorney and author, says the only reference to assisted suicide in the new bill from Senate leader Harry Reid appears on page 364.

SEC. 1553. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON ASSISTED SUICIDE. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Federal Government, and any State or local government or health care provider that receives Federal financial assistance under this Act (or under an amendment made by this Act) or any health plan created under this Act (or under an amendment made by this Act), may not subject an individual or institutional health care entity to discrimination on the basis that the entity does not provide any health care item or service furnished for the purpose of causing, or for the purpose of assisting in causing, the death of any individual, such as by assisted suicide, euthanasia, or mercy killing.

"That’s it. In other words, it is a conscience clause protecting medical professionals who don’t commit assisted suicide. There is no prohibition on promoting it or having it paid for under the plan," he says.

Smith also notes the language under the section 1323 of the bill creating the public option (p. 183), beginning at page 186.

It reads: "(F) PROTECTING ACCESS TO END OF LIFE CARE.—A community health insurance option offered under this section shall be prohibited from limiting access to end of life care."

"If assisted suicide, or even euthanasia, are legally considered forms of ‘end of life’ care in a particular state–as it is now in Oregon, Washington, and Montana–it seems to me that the area’s community health insurance option would be required to provide access to it under this clause," he says. "How else can the provision be read?"

"And because it would have been passed later in time, this clause could be construed to subsume existing federal law that prevents federal funds from being used in assisted suicide," Smith continues.

So why would the health care bill open the door to government-funded promotion of assisted suicide as an option for the disabled and elderly?

"None of this is by accident," Smith says. "Ideology plays a part, certainly. But considering all of the emphasis on cost control in the Obamacare debate, this has to also be about money."

"Can you think of any ‘medical treatment’ for seriously ill or disabled people than assisted suicide/euthanasia?" he explained. "The cost of the drugs to kill are only about $100."

"Think of the millions that could be saved if expensive treatments never have to be rendered because patients have made themselves dead," he concludes.

Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com

Daily Pro-Life News Report Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here. Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.