Catholic Bishops Tell Obama Admin NIH Stem Cell Research Guidelines Flawed
by Steven Ertelt
May 22, 2009
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — The nation’s Catholic bishops have sent a memo to the administration of President Barack Obama concerning the new NIH guidelines. The rules are meant to put Obama’s executive order, overturning the Bush protections against forcing taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research, into place.
David Malloy, the general secretary for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), said the NIH guidelines adopt an immoral position on the controversial research.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) missed an enormous opportunity to show how sound science and responsible ethics can not only co-exist but support and enrich each other, he said in a statement LifeNews.com obtained.
Malloy cited the dignity of human life at every stage and the innate human right not to be subjected to harmful experimentation without ones express and informed consent.
He said laws that fail to recognize this right do not succeed in nullifying the right in question, but only call into question their own moral legitimacy.
In the letter to NIH, Malloy highlighted the central fact of science relevant to the issue of embryonic stem cell research, that the embryo that will be destroyed to obtain embryonic stem cells is a human being at a very early stage of his or her development.
This is not a matter of religious belief, he said, but a fact acknowledged by federal advisory groups on this issue, including the National Bioethics Advisory Commission appointed by President Clinton. This group concluded that because human embryos deserve respect as a form of human life, destroying them for stem cells is justifiable only if no less morally problematic alternatives are available for advancing the research.
Malloy added that alternative methods of stem cell research, such as reprogramming ordinary adult cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) without harming human life, have made great advances under a federal policy preventing researchers from destroying live human embryos for federally funded research.
Yet President Obamas executive order of March 9 not only rescinded that policy, but also rescinded the executive order of 2007 instructing the NIH to thoroughly explore new avenues for obtaining pluripotent stem cells without destroying human embryos, Malloy said. Both science and ethics have been ignored in this decision.
Malloy said the Presidents executive order and the draft guidelines fail the Bioethics Commissions test, by failing to require that morally unproblematic avenues for exploring important medical research goals be thoroughly investigated before the NIH considers any avenues that require destroying embryonic human life.
Avenues of stem cell research which pose no moral problem are now showing great promise. In fact, human patients suffering from all the conditions cited by President Obama when he signed his executive order cancer, juvenile diabetes, Parkinsons disease, spinal cord injury, heart disease have been shown in peer-reviewed studies to benefit from clinical trials using human stem cells, he explained.
And in every case, the benefit has come not from embryonic stem cells, but from the adult and cord blood stem cells that this organization and others have said should receive priority attention," he said.
Malloy expressed relief the proposed guidelines do not seek to fund research in which embryos are created for the purpose of research, but explained how in key respects the Guidelines are nonetheless broader or more permissive than any policy approved in the past by any branch of the federal government."
He also asked the Obama Administration to make a clear and authoritative statement, as the Clinton Administration did, that it will never fund research that relies on the creation of human embryos for research purposes.
Noting that prominent stem cell researchers have recently expressed their own moral misgivings about destroying human embryos for research, Malloy concluded, This is not merely a political or ideological problem, or a problem of religious dogma, but a deeply human problem: We are testing the limits of our obligation to treat all fellow human beings, of every age and condition, with basic respect.
The comments were submitted during the official public comment period on the proposed guidelines, which ends May 26.
Related web sites:
USCCB – https://www.usccb.org/prolife
Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com
Daily Pro-Life News Report Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here. Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.