Montana Supreme Court Gets More Pro-Life Briefs Against OKing Assisted Suicide
by Steven Ertelt
May 1, 2009
Helena, MT (LifeNews.com) — The Montana Supreme Court has received more legal briefs from pro-life groups asking it not to affirm a lower court decision making the state the third to allow assisted suicides. The Christian Legal Society and Christian Medical Association, along with Americans United for Life, weighed in this week.
AUL filed a brief on of a bipartisan group of 28 Montana state senators and representatives arguing there is no right to assisted suicide under the states constitution.
Mailee Smith, staff counsel with the group, told LifeNews.com that the "district court held that a persons constitutional rights are defeated if she does not receive assistance in dying. This means that anyoneeven a patient who cannot administer lethal drugs herselfis entitled to have a physician kill them."
Smith says the Montana ruling would allow the state to go beyond assisted suicide and allow euthanasia.
Whats even worse is that there is no requirement that another person witness the suicide request or that there be written documentation of the request and the basis for it," she explains. "Physicians can unilaterally decide that their patients want to die, with no paper trail to hold them accountable. That is not assisted suicidethat is euthanasia.
The CLS and CMA asked the Montana Supreme Court yesterday to protect the conscience rights of healthcare professionals who object to assisting in suicides.
In a friend of the court brief filed in Baxter v. Montana, the organizations, together comprising over 18,000 Christian medical and legal professionals, urged the state high court to reverse a decision finding a state constitutional right to assisted suicide.
The brief urges the Montana Supreme Court to reverse the district courts decision finding a state constitutional right, permitting the legislative process to work.
The legal papers also asked the court to declare a state right not to participate in an assisted suicide.
Casey Mattox, litigation counsel with the Christian Legal Society, talked with LifeNews.com about the amicus brief.
The trial courts decision to create a constitutional right to obtain assistance from a medical care provider in the form of obtaining a prescription for lethal drugs threatens the rights of healthcare professionals and institutions that hold sincere ethical, moral, and religious objections to participating in the intentional killing of their patients, he explained.
Medical professionals should not be coerced to violate the Hippocratic Oath in order to practice in Montana," he said.
The CLS brief notes that, when Oregon and Washington created laws legalizing assisted suicide, they explicitly protected the rights of objecting medical professionals not to participate.
Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com
Daily Pro-Life News Report Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here. Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.