National News

Bioethical News
Editorials and Op-Eds
International News
State News
Advertising
Reprint/Licensing
About LifeNews.com
Email News@LifeNews.com

Enter your email address
to receive news from LifeNews.com via email.

Do you prefer to receive
news daily or weekly?

Daily Weekly

Do you favor or
oppose abortion?

Favor Oppose


Click here to make a PayPal donation to LifeNews.com!

South Carolina Committee Approves Botched Abortion-Born Alive Protection Bill

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
February 6
, 2009

Add to My Yahoo! Email RSS Print

Columbia, SC (LifeNews.com) -- A South Carolina legislative committee has approved a bill that would provide appropriate medical care and protection for babies who are born alive after a failed abortion. The bill implements a federal law that accomplishes the same purpose and is similar to the Illinois measure President Barack Obama opposed.

The Born-Alive Infant Protection Act says any child born alive in South Carolina is a person under state law.

It applies in cases such as a baby born after a failed abortion or where a premature birth is purposefully induced.

Rep. Greg Delleney, a Republican, is the sponsor of the bill and the head of a subcommittee that approved the measure. The bill now heads to the full House Judiciary Committee for its consideration.

There, earlier this week, the panel approved a bill calling for a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion can be done.

Delleney says the bill requires medical care be given to infants in the same way any other patient deserves proper treatment.

"It seems pretty simple," he said, according to an AP report. "If you come here a living, breathing person, you have to be treated as such. But since Roe v. Wade, life has been devalued."

Holly Gatling, the head of South Carolina Citizens for Life, the statewide pro-life group that also backs the bill, agrees.

"Unlike a fetus that has no more legal right that this Styrofoam cup, a premature infant is a premature infant – and should be a legally protected person -- regardless of how he or she reached that state," she told the panel.

She held up a crushed Styrofoam coffee cup to illustrate the point.

"While there is debate about whether or not to aggressively treat premature infants below a certain birth weight, this is a dispute about medical usefulness, not regarding legal status," Gatling added.

"Medical authorities who argue that treatment below a given birth weight is futile are not arguing that these low-birth weight infants are non-persons, or that it would be legally permissible to dispatch them with hammer blows to the skull, or toss them in the garbage with the morning’s coffee cup," she said.

When he was in the Illinois legislature, state lawmakers considered a similar bill but Obama voted against it saying it would interfere with legal abortions. Even after an abortion-neutralization amendment was added, Obama continued to oppose the bill.


Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright © 2003-2009 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
For information on reprinting and licensing click here.