National News

Bioethical News
Editorials and Op-Eds
International News
State News
Advertising
Reprint/Licensing
About LifeNews.com
Email News@LifeNews.com

Enter your email address
to receive news from LifeNews.com via email.

Do you prefer to receive
news daily or weekly?

Daily Weekly

Do you favor or
oppose abortion?

Favor Oppose


Click here to make a PayPal donation to LifeNews.com!

Ohio Town Violated Pro-Life Advocates' Free Speech Rights, Federal Court Rules

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
January 6
, 2009

Add to My Yahoo! Email RSS Printer

Toledo, OH (LifeNews.com) -- A federal court has ruled than an Ohio city violated the First Amendment rights of pro-life advocates when police officers threatened them with arrest for engaging in pro-life speech. Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund had filed a federal lawsuit against the city of Findlay for the pro-life advocates.

Last July, the group of pro-life advocates from Wisconsin were in town to share the pro-life perspective on the streets of Findlay with local residents.

The chief of police and two officers demanded that the group leave or face arrest and claimed they needed a permit to present their pro-life message on the signs they displayed.

After leaving the area, pro-lifer Michael Marcavage contacted the mayor’s office and soon discovered that no ordinance required the permit and that the mayor and police officers were wrong to use a "scheme" to say a policy existed.

In the opinion declaring the city’s policy unconstitutional, the court wrote, “This permit scheme grants the City virtually unchecked discretion to deny permits for content based reasons."

"There are no objective standards by which the City is bound when considering whether to issue a permit," it added. "Defendants’ arguments to the contrary are not only baseless, but, even worse, border on bad faith.”

Matt Bowman, an ADF attorney, told LifeNews.com that pro-life advocates "shouldn’t be penalized for expressing their beliefs."

“Exercising your First Amendment rights is not a crime. The government has no right to harass and threaten citizens for exercising their First Amendment rights in public," he said.

Bowman said city officials were wrong to ask the pro-life advocates to "request permission before they exercise their First Amendment rights on a public sidewalk" and he said he hoped those involved "will now be free to express their views without fear of government intimidation and censorship.”

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued the decision and the case is Trewhella v. Findlay.

Related web sites:
Alliance Defense Fund - http://www.telladf.org



Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright © 2003-2009 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
For information on reprinting and licensing click here.