National News

Bioethical News
Editorials and Op-Eds
International News
State News
Advertising
Reprint/Licensing
About LifeNews.com
Email News@LifeNews.com

Enter your email address
to receive news from LifeNews.com via email.

Do you prefer to receive
news daily or weekly?

Daily Weekly

Do you favor or
oppose abortion?

Favor Oppose


Click here to make a PayPal donation to LifeNews.com!

Alaska House Committee Approves Revised Partial-Birth Abortion Ban

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
January 22,
2008

Juneau, AK (LifeNews.com) -- The Alaska House Judiciary Committee approved a bill on Monday that would update the language in the state's partial-birth abortion ban to conform to the language of the federal ban. The Supreme Court, last April, upheld the federal ban as Constitutional -- a reversal of a 2000 decision saying a health exception was necessary.

The bill is expected to head to the full House eventually for a debate and vote.

The committee did not hear debate from anyone opposing the measure but Anchorage Democrat Lindsey Holmes proposed an amendment to weaken the bill. She wanted to allow the three-day-long abortion procedure in cases when she claims it may be necessary to protect a woman's physical or mental health.

However, doctors groups have confirmed that a partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary and reports indicate abortion presents a host of mental health and physical health problems for women.

"I'm sure we'll be in a for a fight here," she told the Associated Press. "Generally, I err on the side of the woman and her doctor and not making health care a Class C felony."

John Coghill, a North Pole Republican, sponsored the bill with Republican Wes Keller of Wasilla.

"It's obviously a hot topic," Coghill told AP. "I thought we were going to have more of a legal discussion than we did, but I expect we will have more soon."

Coghill is also the legislator behind a measure that would put parental consent on the state ballot after the Alaska Supreme Court struck down a consent measure last year. The court appeared to indicate that it would be fine with a measure that simply required notification before the abortion.


 

 

 

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright © 2003-2008 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
For information on reprinting and licensing click here.