National News

Bioethical News
Editorials and Op-Eds
International News
State News
Advertising
Reprint/Licensing
About LifeNews.com
Email News@LifeNews.com

Enter your email address
to receive news from LifeNews.com via email.

Do you prefer to receive
news daily or weekly?

Daily Weekly

Do you favor or
oppose abortion?

Favor Oppose


Click here to make a PayPal donation
to LifeNews.com!

Democrat Bob Casey Will Work to Remove Abortion Funding From Senate Bill

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 26
, 2009

Add to My Yahoo! Email RSS Print

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- As one of just two Democrats in the Senate who call themselves pro-life, Bob Casey of Pennsylvania is in a position to become the leader within his party on efforts to remove abortion funding from the health care bill. On Tuesday, Casey said he would do just that.

Casey confirmed he will work to try to remove the massive abortion funding in the bill that comes through the insurance plans offered in the proposed health insurance exchange via the public option and affordability credits.

The House bill includes an amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak that removed the abortion funding and Casey told Congressional Quarterly he will push for something similar, but would not say he would oppose the Senate health care bill if abortion funding remains.

Casey said there is "work to be done" on the issue of abortion funding, adding, There's an obvious difference on where the House came down and where the Senate is."

Casey hinted that he may promote adding his Pregnant Women Support Act as an amendment to the legislation.

That is a bill spearheaded by Democrats for Life of America as a way to put more abortion limits in place as well as funding for social service programs and pregnancy centers that help women with unplanned pregnancies.

"The only other way to reduce the number of abortions ... is to help pregnant women so if they choose to have a child they can get the help and support they need," he said. "I don't know what vehicle that will take, whether that will be one amendment or more than one amendment."

If the amendments to strip abortion funding fail, which political observers say is likely because they will need 60 votes, Casey could join Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, who has already said he will oppose the bill if it funds abortions.

Although Casey, a Pennsylvania Democrat who voted for a similar amendment to the Senate bill to de-fund abortions that failed in committee, is considered a prospect for putting the amendment forward, Sen. Orrin Hatch has already said he plans an amendment.

Hatch said on November 17 that he would sponsor on the floor the amendment he tried to get attached to the bill in two different committees -- that Casey voted for this past summer.

When asked if his amendment would mirror the Stupak language, Hatch replied, "I think so, I think that's a fair appraisal."


Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

 

 

 

 

 

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright © 2003-2009 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
For information on reprinting and licensing click here.