National News

Bioethical News
Editorials and Op-Eds
International News
State News
Advertising
Reprint/Licensing
About LifeNews.com
Email News@LifeNews.com

Enter your email address
to receive news from LifeNews.com via email.

Do you prefer to receive
news daily or weekly?

Daily Weekly

Do you favor or
oppose abortion?

Favor Oppose


Click here to make a PayPal donation to LifeNews.com!

Senate Rejects Cutting Funds to Abortion Facilities for Family Planning

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
October 19,
2007

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The U.S. Senate on Thursday night rejected an effort by pro-life lawmakers to cut federal funding for family planning efforts carried out by abortion facilities. Backers of an amendment to do that said their goal was not to cut such efforts but to make sure taxpayer dollars aren't sent to abortion businesses.

However, the Senate voted 52-41 against the amendment pro-life Sen. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, offered to the fiscal year 2008 Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill (S 1710).

The federal funds don't directly fund abortions, as the annual Hyde amendment prohibits federal taxpayer funding of virtually all abortions.

But the Vitter amendment focused on what pro-life advocates call fungible funds -- money meant for non-abortion purposes that allows abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood to more easily pay for abortions.

During the debate on his amendment, Vitter said it is a "very reasonable mainstream policy to say" that the government is not going to "support groups that perform abortions."

Vitter added that federal funds subsidize abortion by supporting organizations that provide them, even if the groups do not use federal funding to perform abortions.

"The way it works now, we send federal dollars to abortion providers ... and it supports their overhead and it supports their organizations," he said.

But pro-abortion Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, led the fight against the Vitter amendment and claimed it would have done "nothing to reduce abortions."

Had the Vitter amendment been adopted, it would have brought an end to the current practice of co-locating abortion clinics and federally funded “Title X” family planning clinics.

Republicans were unified in support of the amendment with even pro-life Democrats Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania voting against it.

Republican Sens. Kit Bond, Sue Collins, Dick Lugar, Lisa Murkowski, Olympia Snowe, Arlen Specter, and Ted Stevens joined Democrats in voting against the Vitter amendment.

Related web sites:
See how your senator voted by clicking here.



 

 

 

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright © 2003-2007 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
For information on reprinting and licensing click here.