by
Wesley J. Smith
August 11,
2008
LifeNews.com
Note: Award winning author Wesley J. Smith is special consultant to
the Center for Bioethics and Culture Network. His current book is
Consumers Guide to a Brave New World.
I
have become so sick and tired of the baloney that swirls around assisted
suicide advocacy like gruel in a blender.
Assisted suicide is not really about the rare case when nothing else
can be done to alleviate suffering--which has not been the case yet
in any legalized jurisdiction from the Netherlands, to Switzerland,
to Oregon. Rather, it is about establishing the right to what in essence
would be death on demand.
This
is clearly stated in a speech given by Ludwig Minelli, the suicide
zealot who heads Dignitas.
Writing about the Swiss Supreme Court ruling granting a right to assisted
suicide for the mentally ill -- which
I wrote about here -- Minelli claims that suicide and assisted
suicide both are human rights. In other words, the so-called limitations
that would limit this killing to the terminally or hopelessly ill
are bogus.
From his speech (no link):
If the Right to Suicide is a Human Right, and no doubt whatsoever can be raised after this outstanding Swiss decision, we must accept that, in order to make use of this right, there must be no legal requirements other than that the person has the mental capacity needed to decide to end his or her own life. Conditions which insisted that somebody must be terminally or severely ill would interfere with the essence of that Human Right. Human Rights are, inherently, unconditional. They cannot be made subject to conditions this is fundamental to their being meaningful for the humans who bear them.
But this so-called right is even more that an individual right to do with one's own body what one will--it includes the right to help from others to make sure one gets dead:
Minelli gives lip service to prevention, but if a patient knows that death is at the end of that process, prevention just becomes a hoop to jump through, indeed a hoop that would fall by the wayside as other so-called guidelines have wherever assisted suicide is legalized.
It is also worth noting that the speech was given to Dutch euthanasia advocates who already live in the most euthanasia friendly country in the world--and yet it is still not enough. That is because it never will be enough.
So this is the future that assisted suicide/euthanasia advocates either explicitly seek, or will bring about whether or not that is there intention since the logic here is impeccable.
The answer, of course, is that there is no "right" to suicide, that societies have the duty to protect all people's lives--even from self destruction--and that, as Jefferson put it in the Declaration of Independence, the right to life is inalienable.
So too with selling oneself into slavery and declaring a right to burn your arms with cigarettes--both "choices" that should also be prohibited. Such actions not only harm the individual, but are profoundly subversive of decency and equal regard for the lives of all people in society.
Sign Up for Free Pro-Life News From LifeNews.com
|
Daily
Pro-Life News Report
|
Twice-Weekly
Pro-Life
News Report |
|
Receive
a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest
pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell
research. Sign up
here.
|
Receive
a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life
news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research.
Sign up here.
|




