Court Allows 13-Year-Old to Abort Her 32-Week-Old Unborn Baby

International   Micaiah Bilger   Sep 6, 2017   |   9:59AM    New Delhi, India

The Supreme Court of India gave a 13-year-old rape survivor permission to abort her late-term, viable unborn baby Wednesday.

The young girl from Mumbai is 32-weeks pregnant with her unborn baby, far past the point of viability and the country’s 20-week legal abortion limit. The man who allegedly raped her, a co-worker of her father, has been arrested.

Abortions are illegal after 20 weeks of pregnancy in India. However, women increasingly have been petitioning the high court for permission to abort their unborn babies after 20 weeks in cases involving fetal abnormalities or sexual assault.

NDTV reports the high court gave the girl permission to have a late-term abortion after a panel of doctors said she would suffer agony and trauma if she gives birth to a live child.

“It has been emotionally draining for the girl’s parents as their child is pregnant and they are unable to cope up with this fact,” said Sneha Mukherjee, a lawyer for the girl, to the news agency AFP.

The young teen’s abortion is scheduled for Friday, but she will be admitted to the hospital Thursday to begin the multiple-day procedure, the Economic Times reports. At 32 weeks of pregnancy, her unborn baby is basically fully formed and highly likely to survive outside the womb if born alive.

Late-term abortions also are risky and can be deadly for the mother as well as her unborn child.

The 13-year-old girl’s parents said they were not aware of the abuse or their young daughter’s pregnancy until about a month ago. They said they took her to the doctor because she was rapidly gaining weight, and they thought she was having problems with her thyroid.

Gynecologist Dr Nikhil Datar told the BBC: “She was brought to me by her parents on 9 August. They suspected she had a thyroid problem or some other medical condition because she was gaining weight. The scan showed that she was 27 weeks pregnant so I informed the police.”

Datar said the young girl understands that she is pregnant, though she does not comprehend the full impact of her condition. It is unclear what the girl’s wishes are regarding her unborn baby.

Datar recommended a late-term abortion, arguing that the girl’s pelvis is not fully developed and childbirth could cause her physical and mental trauma. However, the doctor did not explain how the abortion will be less risky than childbirth.

A late-term abortion is a very risky, multiple day procedure that can kill the mother as well as her unborn baby. On the first day, the abortionist typically injects a poison into the unborn baby’s heart or head to kill them. They also begin to dilate the mother’s cervix to prepare for childbirth. On the third or fourth day, they induce labor and the mother gives birth to her dead baby.

SUPPORT PRO-LIFE NEWS! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation

For this reason, the Supreme Court of India rejected another family’s request for a late-term abortion earlier this summer. In that case, the 10-year-old girl’s parents requested the late-term abortion without their daughter’s knowledge; the Supreme Court of India rejected their petition after medical examiners determined that the abortion could endanger the 10-year-old girl’s life.

The 10-year-old delivered her child via cesarean section on Aug. 17, according to the local news. Alakh Alok Srivastava, a lawyer for the girl’s family, told CNN that the girl’s parents are making an adoption plan for the baby.

In May, a very similar case appeared before the India Supreme Court. The high court granted permission for another 10-year-old rape victim to have an abortion when she was about 20 weeks pregnant. In that case, the girl’s stepfather allegedly raped her.

Similarly, in 2015, the India Supreme Court gave an exception to a 14-year-old rape victim who was past 20 weeks pregnant. At the time, the BBC reported a team of doctors decided the girl was not physically or emotionally fit to give birth to her baby.

As LifeNews previously reported, the first judge involved in the case, Abhilasha Kumari, ruled differently. He said it was a difficult decision but concluded that the unborn baby is innocent just like the victim.

Kumari said: “Whatever be the circumstances in which the child was conceived, whatever the trauma of the young mother, the fact remains that the child is also not to blame for being conceived. It did not ask to be born. The child is innocent, just like the victim, its mother.”

However, the India Supreme Court overturned his ruling in 2015 and allowed the unborn baby to be aborted.