LifeNews.com

Obama Admin’s HHS Mandate Changes Still Violate Religious Conscience

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 7/1/13 11:09 AM

National

On Friday, the Obama administration released the final changes to the HHS mandate that compels religious groups that pay for birth control drugs and pills that may cause abortions. The changes offered no new protections for religious groups that say the HHS mandate violates their conscience rights.

Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, which has sued the Obama administration over the mandate, told LifeNews his group still objects.

“I do not see any change that satisfies the moral and legal concerns that Priests for Life, as the second Catholic organization to launch a federal lawsuit against the mandate, has articulated for over a year now, both inside and outside the courts. Therefore, I am meeting with our attorneys today to prepare a renewed lawsuit,” he said.

“Up to now, the courts have secured protection for Priests for Life from enforcement of the mandate. But that is not enough for us. We want it declared unconstitutional, so that neither we nor anyone else has to endure its unjust and immoral demands,” Pavone added

An attorney with a pro-life legal group that has filed multiple lawsuits for HHS mandate victims agrees.

“On multiple levels, the president is articulating what is arguably the most narrow view of religious freedom ever expressed by an administration in this nation’s history, Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Gregory S. Baylor says in a statement.

“Unfortunately the final rule announced today is the same old, same old. As we said when the proposed rule was issued, this doesn’t solve the religious conscience problem because it still makes our non-profit clients the gatekeepers to abortion and provides no protection to religious businesses” he says in a statement. “The easy way to resolve this would have been to exempt sincere religious employers completely, as the Constitution requires. Instead this issue will have to be decided in court.”

Matthew Clark of the ACLJ, another pro-life legal group with many lawsuits it has filed against the mandate for victims, also agrees and wrote a lengthy analysis piece:

The Obama Administration has released its newest attempt to bestow upon a segment of the American populace a benevolent gift of religious freedom.

The HHS mandate provides that all employer health insurance plans cover abortion pills regardless of whether that life-ending drug coverage directly violates the deeply held religious beliefs of those forced to pay for it.

The latest HHS rule proposes a slight shift in the proposed “accommodation,” but it does nothing to change the danger of the government mandate. It’s the same unconstitutional mandate imposed on religious liberty.

The so-called accommodation provides that nonprofit religious organizations can be excluded from being forced to provide this coverage, but that their insurance company must pay for and provide insurance coverage for the employees at “no cost.”  So who pays for the abortion pills?

Here’s what part of the rule actually says:

With respect to payments for contraceptive services, the issuer may not impose any cost-sharing requirements (such as a copayment, coinsurance, or a deductible), or impose any premium, fee, or other charge, or any portion thereof, directly or indirectly, on the eligible organization, the group health plan, or plan participants or beneficiaries. The issuer must segregate premium revenue collected from the eligible organization from the monies used to provide payments for contraceptive services.

Here’s how HHS explains it, “The insurer then notifies enrollees in the health plan that it is providing them separate no-cost payments for contraceptive services for as long as they remain enrolled in the health plan.”

If that doesn’t makes sense to you, it’s because that doesn’t make sense period.

Where can the insurance company possibly get this money?  “No-cost payments”?  Have we entered the twilight zone or a world without logic?

Someone is paying for this, and the new accounting gimmicks HHS is attempting to set up are going to be almost impossible to enforce.  The reality is nothing changed.  And that’s just the way President Obama likes it.

It’s the same pro-abortion accounting scheme that allows us to send half a billion dollars in taxpayer funds to the largest abortion provider in America and still not “violate” the law which prohibiting funding of abortion.

Even more disturbing is who gets no “accommodation.”  See to the Obama Administration only a “nonprofit” which holds itself out as a “religious organization” can have religious beliefs.  A pro-life organization, for example, that doesn’t “hold itself out as a religious organization” would be forced to pay for its employees abortion pills even as it seeks to end abortion.

CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!

 

The so-called accommodation also does not cover for-profit businesses.  To the Obama Administration a businessman must leave his religion at the door, as if the First Amendment doesn’t apply to businessmen.  If the First Amendment doesn’t apply to businesses, then could someone please explain Freedom of the Press.  Though, with recent revelations of spying on the press and accusing journalists of being co-conspirators, maybe the Administration is just being consistent in this view.

The reality is that all Americans deserve to have their religious liberty protected, and the Constitution does just that.  The day before HHS issued its final rule, another federal appeals court stopped its application to another for-profit business, Hobby Lobby, tracking the arguments made in our amicus brief in that case.  In the ACLJ’s cases against the abortion-pill mandate, our clients are now 7-0.  These cases will continue, and this issue will eventually be decided by the Supreme Court.

Pushing aside all the accounting gimmicks and demagoguery of the Obama Administration, the truth is simple.  The HHS abortion-pill mandate violates the constitutional rights of millions of Americans, no matter how you spin it.