Cardinal Dolan Slams Media Silence on Battle Over HHS Mandate
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 12/13/12 2:38 PM
Cardinal Dolan, the head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, is slamming the media silence on the battles against the HHS mandate, the Obama administration’s attempt to force religious groups to fund drugs that may cause abortions.
Earlier this month, in what top pro-life legal groups described as a “landmark ruling against the HHS Mandate,” a federal judge ruled against the Obama administration’s assertion that the government’s supposed “safe harbor” was adequate to protect religious organizations from suffering imminent harm.
The USCCB president isn’t happy the mainstream media gave scant coverage to the important decision.
“Did you hear about the decision last week by U.S. District Court Judge Brian M. Cogan in the lawsuit brought by the Archdiocese of New York, ArchCare, (the agency coordinating our Catholic healthcare in the archdiocese) and three plaintiffs from the Diocese of Rockville Centre on Long Island, against the administration for the unconstitutional HHS mandate?” Dolan asks.
“You probably did not, as there seems to have been virtually no mention of the decision – in favor of the archdiocese, by the way – in any local newspaper or on television,” he laments.”As far as I can tell, and I’ve looked rather carefully, there hasn’t even been a story in the New York Times, which couldn’t wait to publish an editorial this past October, admonishing the bishops, when a federal judge in Missouri found for the administration and dismissed a similar case brought by a private, for-profit, mining company. (The Times also didn’t have much to say last week, when the appeals court temporarily blocked the bad Missouri decision the Times had gushed over.)”
Dolan’s column about the HHS mandate battle continues:
Judge Cogan’s decision last week turned back a motion by the administration to have our lawsuit dismissed. You’ll remember, perhaps, that back in May, the Archdiocese of New York, ArchCare, the Diocese of Rockville Centre, Catholic Charities of Rockville Centre, and Catholic Health Systems of Long Island filed a lawsuit in federal court in Brooklyn, one of more than two dozen similar lawsuits filed around the country that day. These lawsuits argue that the mandate from Health and Human Services would unconstitutionally presume to define the nature of the Church’s ministry, and force religious employers to violate their conscience or face onerous fines for not providing services in our health insurance that are contrary to our consciences and faith.
The judge’s decision doesn’t settle the case, but allows the case to proceed so that it might be heard in court. (Two of our original co-plaintiffs, the Diocese of Rockville Centre and Catholic Charities of Rockville Centre, have been dismissed from the suit, as the judge found that their insurance plans would not presently be affected by the HHS mandate. The Archdiocese of New York, ArchCare, and CHSLI remain as plaintiffs.) That’s significant, because the administration has been successful in getting some of the other cases dismissed, but in his decision Judge Cogan found that there was very real possibility that we plaintiffs would “face future injuries stemming from their forced choice between incurring fines or acting in violation of their religious beliefs.”
CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!
And what of the administration’s contention that the suit should be dismissed because they were going to change the HHS mandate to address the concerns of religious employers? As Judge Cogan wrote, “…the First Amendment does not require citizens to accept assurances from the government that, if the government later determines it has made a misstep, it will take ameliorative action. There is no, ‘Trust us, changes are coming’ clause in the Constitution.”
Bravo, Judge Cogan!
Of course, there is still a long way to go before these cases are final, and it would be our hope that the administration will be true to their word and amend the HHS mandate so that it does provide a real religious exemption and freedom of conscience protection.
Until then, we will continue to seek justice in the courts. Thanks to last week’s decision in Federal Court in Brooklyn, it looks like we will have that chance.